0x13:reports:d1t2t03-quic-tutorial
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
0x13:reports:d1t2t03-quic-tutorial [2019/04/08 23:06] – ehalep | 0x13:reports:d1t2t03-quic-tutorial [2019/09/28 17:04] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Report by: Evangelos Haleplidis | Report by: Evangelos Haleplidis | ||
- | Jana from Fastly, started his QUIC tutorial by going through the history of the QUIC protocol. The QUIC protocol begun at Google around 2014 and was between google services and Chrome and mobile apps. The inital | + | Jana from Fastly, started his QUIC tutorial by going through the history of the QUIC protocol. The QUIC protocol begun at Google around 2014 and was between google services and Chrome and mobile apps. The initial |
The QUIC standard is over UDP and uses TLS encryption. QUIC design goals are the following: | The QUIC standard is over UDP and uses TLS encryption. QUIC design goals are the following: | ||
1. Deployability and evolvability. QUIC uses encryption to remove the issues of middleboxes. Jana recounted an issue with the flipping of a bit, QUIC was blocked by firewalls. | 1. Deployability and evolvability. QUIC uses encryption to remove the issues of middleboxes. Jana recounted an issue with the flipping of a bit, QUIC was blocked by firewalls. | ||
2. Low latency secure connection establishment. QUIC mostly creates establishes connections with 0-RTT and sometimes with 1-RTT. | 2. Low latency secure connection establishment. QUIC mostly creates establishes connections with 0-RTT and sometimes with 1-RTT. | ||
- | 3. Streams and multiplexing. Lightweight | + | 3. Streams and multiplexing. Lightweight |
4. Better loss recovery and flexible congestion control. | 4. Better loss recovery and flexible congestion control. | ||
5. Congestion migration | 5. Congestion migration | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Q: Optimization for CDN? | Q: Optimization for CDN? | ||
- | A: This should be a layer abouve | + | A: This should be a layer above quic |
Jana then moved to the issue of tracing. In regards to wireshark, it is not enough as data is encrypted. You have to record the whole data and decode before looking at wireshark. Tracing happends at endpoints. Tracing is getting traction, there are currently two tools, quic-trace and Quicvis. | Jana then moved to the issue of tracing. In regards to wireshark, it is not enough as data is encrypted. You have to record the whole data and decode before looking at wireshark. Tracing happends at endpoints. Tracing is getting traction, there are currently two tools, quic-trace and Quicvis. | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
In regards to the acknowledge, | In regards to the acknowledge, | ||
- | Site: https:// | + | Site: https:// |
github: https:// | github: https:// | ||
- | |||
- | Slides: | ||
- | Videos: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
0x13/reports/d1t2t03-quic-tutorial.1554764796.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/09/28 17:04 (external edit)